Check it out:
OK, you have fought hard to deny or challenge the realities of climate change, perhaps because you are afraid of the policies that might have to be put in place; or are afraid of the possibilities of increased government intervention; or you don't think it will be that bad; or...
... Martin Hertzberg did a grave disservice to your readers by making false and defamatory statements about me and my climate scientist colleagues ... It's hard to imagine anyone packing more lies and distortions into a single commentary. Mr. Hertzberg uses libelous language in characterizing...
For those who deny God, our savior Lord Jesus. How can you say God didn't create the world when he created the banana?
Note that the banana:
Is shaped for the human hand
Has a non-slip surface
Has outward indicators of inward content:
Green - not ripe enough
Yellow - just right for eating...
Matthew 22:31-33? http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew%2022:31-33&version=NASB;
Supporting Scriptures:
2 Corinthians 5:8; Philippians 1:23; Luke 23:42-43; Luke 24:39; Job 26:5-6; Matthew 18:34-35; Luke 16:22-31; Revelation 20:10; Matthew 25:41...
Tom Hiltachk, former Philip Morris outside counsel, has taken the lead in pushing California Prop 23, which would repeal the state's landmark climate change law. Mike Carpenter, the former top California lobbyist for Philip Morris is now lobbying for Valero, which is one of the main oil...
...the other end of the GW bell curve? That is, many scientists believe that the warming trend is far more serious than what the U.S. press has reported. And have the climate scientists who are most emphatic in calling for aggressive action by the world's governments been virtually ignored?
I can just imagine them saying "Oh come on! The sun goes around the earth, everyone knows it! Don't you believe your own eyes? And don't tell me people came from monkeys!"
Why won't deniers answer "Radiative Forcing" questions with a straight answer?
Is it because there is a total net POSITIVE effect due to human activities?
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter2.pdf
with credible sources?
It has been asked before and I’m sure it will be asked again, why do deniers fail to back up their answers with a reliable references. Why do they prefer to answer with uninformed opinions rather than backing up what they say with proof?
Thanks Ed B for helping me prove...
...anomalously warm weather, but mock? those in the reality-based community when it's unusually cold? Seems a bit inconsistent, no?
(BTW - I do understand that the weather on any given day is not necessarily indicative of climate change either way)