That's me!
The article opens by acknowledging that 66 percent of Americans believe creationism is definitely or probably true from a recent poll. Yet the article turns to biological anthropologist Greg Laden for how to squelch the opposing viewpoint to evolutionism.
And so on and so forth...
read a dictionary people, evolutionist has been a word since before 1993.
naturalism is a doctrine that states that everything has to be made in a completely natural way away from any magical, supernatural or religious way.
so when a religious scientist says he does not believe in evolution...
...animal kingdom? And don't you dare try to use the binomial nomenclature on me! I've heard it countless times before!
Linnaeus was a Christian and creationist! And even though he started doubting God by the end of his observations, and supported evolution with his findings originally meant to...
...animal kingdom? And don't you dare try to use the binomial nomenclature on me! I've heard it countless times before!
Linnaeus was a Christian and creationist! And even though he started doubting God by the end of his observations, and supported evolution with his findings originally meant to...
...vice verca? question says it all, logic behind this is: if you argue from the others perspective you will know more about it
i am looking for serious answers, no one lined answers akin to "you are stupid, creationism is fake".
i am looking for well thought out, well researched answers that...
It would be a natural assumption that only those who worked together helping each other would be good material for evolution. Instead people are envious, hate each other, kill each other and abuse the vulnerable. How does this improve the human race?
Aren't I just a product of evolution? Am I not what millions and millions of years of evolution has created, oh you of great understanding?
Or, do you argue against "religion" because that to is the hand you were dealt, as a product of evolution, and so you have simply accepted your roll to do...