Jul 5, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Abortion is Wrong
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sexyymama" data-source="post: 3272639" data-attributes="member: 155973"><p>Yeah I should have worded that differently and put a "viable" human life in there.</p><p>A collection of cells is the start of a human life. I agree. It might be viable it might not. A fair percentage are not viable just naturally. There are any number of outcomes for that collection of cells, one of which is eventually being born as a baby.</p><p>What I was trying to get across was the gradual and sliding scale nature of embryological development whereby life, as lived by fully developed humans like you and me, emerges from that development. It's not on/off, either or.</p><p>A collection of cells is not in the same order or magnitude of "human life" as a baby the day befoe it's born and applying the same concerns and criteria for both doesn't take that into account.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sexyymama, post: 3272639, member: 155973"] Yeah I should have worded that differently and put a "viable" human life in there. A collection of cells is the start of a human life. I agree. It might be viable it might not. A fair percentage are not viable just naturally. There are any number of outcomes for that collection of cells, one of which is eventually being born as a baby. What I was trying to get across was the gradual and sliding scale nature of embryological development whereby life, as lived by fully developed humans like you and me, emerges from that development. It's not on/off, either or. A collection of cells is not in the same order or magnitude of "human life" as a baby the day befoe it's born and applying the same concerns and criteria for both doesn't take that into account. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top