Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="christinat" data-source="post: 3272995" data-attributes="member: 153498">Sure, if you analyse the figures from the very early stages. These figures I&#039;m sure reduce as the term lengthens. These days you are advised that up to the first 3 months things are more likely to go wrong. And in terms of expectations that&#039;s where you would expect higher failure rates. If you took the figures from 2-3 months in to the end, then miscarriage figures I think would be lower.But generally speaking I don&#039;t think we expect miscarriage to be the majority or the norm once the more vulnerable early stages are passed. Do you ?That&#039;s what I was getting at. But sure I accept that in the earlier stages the failure rates are much higher.From the link:I also think it&#039;s something of a moot point: So what ?Because a lot end on their own has no bearing at all on whether anyone&#039;s more or less justified to end it themselves.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="christinat, post: 3272995, member: 153498"] Sure, if you analyse the figures from the very early stages. These figures I'm sure reduce as the term lengthens. These days you are advised that up to the first 3 months things are more likely to go wrong. And in terms of expectations that's where you would expect higher failure rates. If you took the figures from 2-3 months in to the end, then miscarriage figures I think would be lower. But generally speaking I don't think we expect miscarriage to be the majority or the norm once the more vulnerable early stages are passed. Do you ? That's what I was getting at. But sure I accept that in the earlier stages the failure rates are much higher. From the link: I also think it's something of a moot point: So what ? Because a lot end on their own has no bearing at all on whether anyone's more or less justified to end it themselves. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…