Jul 4, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Abortion is Wrong
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kimberlyk" data-source="post: 3273145" data-attributes="member: 131192"><p>Again driving is far less of a simple cause and effect. Yes there is an increased risk when driving, however motoring incidents are the result of people breaking the road rules and/or driving irresponsibly and not to conditions. In other words, they are the result of someone doing something wrong as is written down in law. Yes there are some grey areas regarding some 'accidents' but so are there in abortions - and I am not talking about these.</p><p></p><p>So regarding the sympathy vote when driving...</p><p>-Someone is drunk and speeding and subsequently crashes their car into a tree in a single vehicle accident. They are the only occupant in the car and only person hurt/killed. No sympathy for them directly - but perhaps some for their family.</p><p></p><p>-Someone's family is driving home from the school pickup and driving responsibly are hit by someone who was texting on the mobile phone and had their eyes off the road. Sympathy for the family. No sympathy for the phone user.</p><p></p><p>You could keep coming up with general situations that result in a general increase in risk. You could very well say you should never leave your home due to increase in risk. I am talking about judging each individual incident separately.</p><p></p><p>About the financial comment. Presuming the child grows up to be a valuable member of society (get's a job) the value they ad to the economy is generally deemed worth the investment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kimberlyk, post: 3273145, member: 131192"] Again driving is far less of a simple cause and effect. Yes there is an increased risk when driving, however motoring incidents are the result of people breaking the road rules and/or driving irresponsibly and not to conditions. In other words, they are the result of someone doing something wrong as is written down in law. Yes there are some grey areas regarding some 'accidents' but so are there in abortions - and I am not talking about these. So regarding the sympathy vote when driving... -Someone is drunk and speeding and subsequently crashes their car into a tree in a single vehicle accident. They are the only occupant in the car and only person hurt/killed. No sympathy for them directly - but perhaps some for their family. -Someone's family is driving home from the school pickup and driving responsibly are hit by someone who was texting on the mobile phone and had their eyes off the road. Sympathy for the family. No sympathy for the phone user. You could keep coming up with general situations that result in a general increase in risk. You could very well say you should never leave your home due to increase in risk. I am talking about judging each individual incident separately. About the financial comment. Presuming the child grows up to be a valuable member of society (get's a job) the value they ad to the economy is generally deemed worth the investment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top