Jun 16, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Random Interesting Topics
an industrial/organizational psychologist is interested in determining
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gldjns" data-source="post: 2293147" data-attributes="member: 284049"><p>The only way she can guage if the five-minute breaks will increase productivity, is to put it to the test. She is much closer to the situation than anyone on here. How would we know what effect it would have on the workers? I can only speak for myself, and in my opinion, the 15-minute break seems to work best. Five minutes is too short of a break to have any effectiveness on productivity, and could be more distracting than helpful. Actually, I think breaks should last 20 minutes to give the worker a chance to relax and refresh. A worker who is overly-stressed and overworked will produce less than one who has a 20-minute respite in the morning and the afternoon. Well, that's just my opinion based on my own productivity. A rested worker is a better worker. Five minute breaks sound like sweatshop management, if you want to know the truth. Did you perhaps have a typo error? Did you mean 15 rather than 5?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gldjns, post: 2293147, member: 284049"] The only way she can guage if the five-minute breaks will increase productivity, is to put it to the test. She is much closer to the situation than anyone on here. How would we know what effect it would have on the workers? I can only speak for myself, and in my opinion, the 15-minute break seems to work best. Five minutes is too short of a break to have any effectiveness on productivity, and could be more distracting than helpful. Actually, I think breaks should last 20 minutes to give the worker a chance to relax and refresh. A worker who is overly-stressed and overworked will produce less than one who has a 20-minute respite in the morning and the afternoon. Well, that's just my opinion based on my own productivity. A rested worker is a better worker. Five minute breaks sound like sweatshop management, if you want to know the truth. Did you perhaps have a typo error? Did you mean 15 rather than 5? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top