Are all Martial Art's meant to teach you to defend yourself?

S

ShttTalkExpress

New member
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Points
1
It seems like some martial arts, like kendo, which uses swords, aren't realistic for learning how to defend yourself. Maybe once it was, when things were handled with swords, but I mean now, why are they still taught? Is it just for tradition like im assuming it is, or are they really operating under the premise that they are teaching you how to realistically defend yourself? I'm not trying to put any styles down, I'm just curious.
 
No, not everything.

Zen archery and kendo are perfect examples. This has more to do with Japanese tradition and spirituality than anything else. I'm not aware of anybody that carries their bow with them expecting to use it if they need to.

Some people also still practise the traditional drawing of the sword, Iado. One learns to draw the sword and cut in one motion. Useful if you're a samurai. In the XXth century, not so much. But it does help develop focus.

And of course, there are two types of Tai Chi. There's the martial art that's still being practised, but there's also the exercise we know better of in the west. Most of the movements are still there, but those who do it do it for the relaxation and the health benefits.

The martial arts is a really vast world. Not everyone is in it for the same reasons.
 
Originally martial arts were learned in order to teach a person defense, control, discipline, agility, balance, strength training, as well as fighting style. Now in this day and age, some martial arts are still used for defense, such as Karate, Aikido, Kung Fu..., but arts like Kendo are practiced mostly for the disciplining of the body and mind not so much for the defense aspect. Yes, tradition also has a part to play in these disciplines.
It's like fencing or archery, people do not use these weapons anymore for battle or defense (although some do still hunt with bows and arrows), but rather for the skill.
 
Back
Top