Jun 17, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Rant-Whine-Complain-Vent
Are any of the claims in this chemist's rant true?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PaulB" data-source="post: 2148085" data-attributes="member: 210032"><p>Pure fantasy. "It is still cooler than it was a thousand years ago in spite of their fraudulent efforts by anti-science kook activists like Mann, Hansen, Jones and a host of others that tried to cook the books. "</p><p></p><p>This despite the copious and publicly available data to the contrary:</p><p></p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png</p><p></p><p>That’s</p><p></p><p>…/wiki/File:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png</p><p></p><p>Also, the National Academies Press has released a book (free online) discussing the climate for the past 2000 years, and how well we know it: Tree rings, ice cores, error bars, the lot:</p><p></p><p>http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11676</p><p></p><p>That’s</p><p></p><p>http://www.nap.edu/catalog.</p><p>php?record_id=11676</p><p></p><p></p><p>So is the rant you quote pure piffle? No; it does not rise to so high a standard. I no longer even bother to dignify the person who wrote it with a thumbs down.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PaulB, post: 2148085, member: 210032"] Pure fantasy. "It is still cooler than it was a thousand years ago in spite of their fraudulent efforts by anti-science kook activists like Mann, Hansen, Jones and a host of others that tried to cook the books. " This despite the copious and publicly available data to the contrary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png That’s …/wiki/File:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png Also, the National Academies Press has released a book (free online) discussing the climate for the past 2000 years, and how well we know it: Tree rings, ice cores, error bars, the lot: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11676 That’s http://www.nap.edu/catalog. php?record_id=11676 So is the rant you quote pure piffle? No; it does not rise to so high a standard. I no longer even bother to dignify the person who wrote it with a thumbs down. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top