Jul 6, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Are these Watts, Carter, and Archibald talks the best global warming 'skeptics'
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dana1981" data-source="post: 2205523" data-attributes="member: 761954"><p>can do? Apparently there's a Watts Up With That tour of Australia happening right now. The tour consists of talks given by Anthony Watts, Bob Carter, and David Archibald. Bob Carter sums up their arguments thusly:</p><p></p><p>1) Temp record is unreliable, 2) CO2 effect is saturated, 3) CO2 is plant food, and 4) It’s the sun. </p><p>http://www.skepticalscience.com/Watts-it-like-at-a-climate-skeptic-speakers-event.html</p><p></p><p>All of these arguments are long-debunked, with the exception of 'plant food', which is the basis of a non sequitur.</p><p></p><p>Now granted, none of these presenters are climate scientists. But obviously they think highly enough of themselves to go on tour (although apparently their audiences have been extremely sparse). But are these long-debunked arguments and logical fallacies really the best the denial movement can do?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dana1981, post: 2205523, member: 761954"] can do? Apparently there's a Watts Up With That tour of Australia happening right now. The tour consists of talks given by Anthony Watts, Bob Carter, and David Archibald. Bob Carter sums up their arguments thusly: 1) Temp record is unreliable, 2) CO2 effect is saturated, 3) CO2 is plant food, and 4) It’s the sun. http://www.skepticalscience.com/Watts-it-like-at-a-climate-skeptic-speakers-event.html All of these arguments are long-debunked, with the exception of 'plant food', which is the basis of a non sequitur. Now granted, none of these presenters are climate scientists. But obviously they think highly enough of themselves to go on tour (although apparently their audiences have been extremely sparse). But are these long-debunked arguments and logical fallacies really the best the denial movement can do? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top