Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DEMOCRAT" data-source="post: 2193751" data-attributes="member: 429481">In order to stimulate your thinking, as well a create a little thought experiment, how would you go about arguing with an agnostic theist, a person who believes in God but knows he cannot prove that such a deity exists?This interesting. Some have decided that arguing against agnosticism is a dead end, and stopped arguing, and others chose to pursue it nonetheless.And to the others: it is not contradictory, nor is it a made-up term. It even has its own wikipedia page:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic_theismIn my opinion, it is impossible to argue about God, because in the end agnosticism will win, whether it be atheist or theist in nature. It interests me that some try to argue against something that can&#039;t be defeated.This interesting. Some have decided that arguing against agnosticism is a dead end, and stopped arguing, and others chose to pursue it nonetheless.And to the others: it is not contradictory, nor is it a made-up term. It even has its own wikipedia page:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic_theismIn my opinion, it is impossible to argue about God, because in the end agnosticism will win, whether it be atheist or theist in nature. It interests me that some try to argue against something that can&#039;t be defeated.Sorry, accidental double post.Sorry, accidental double post.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DEMOCRAT, post: 2193751, member: 429481"] In order to stimulate your thinking, as well a create a little thought experiment, how would you go about arguing with an agnostic theist, a person who believes in God but knows he cannot prove that such a deity exists? This interesting. Some have decided that arguing against agnosticism is a dead end, and stopped arguing, and others chose to pursue it nonetheless. And to the others: it is not contradictory, nor is it a made-up term. It even has its own wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic_theism In my opinion, it is impossible to argue about God, because in the end agnosticism will win, whether it be atheist or theist in nature. It interests me that some try to argue against something that can't be defeated. This interesting. Some have decided that arguing against agnosticism is a dead end, and stopped arguing, and others chose to pursue it nonetheless. And to the others: it is not contradictory, nor is it a made-up term. It even has its own wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic_theism In my opinion, it is impossible to argue about God, because in the end agnosticism will win, whether it be atheist or theist in nature. It interests me that some try to argue against something that can't be defeated. Sorry, accidental double post. Sorry, accidental double post. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…