Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nate" data-source="post: 2495079" data-attributes="member: 215161">Group P: Tigers, Rangers, Red Sox, Orioles, Phillies, Nats, Brewers, Reds, Pirates, Astros, Giants, PadresGroup S: Royals, Angels, Yankees, Marlins, Cardinals, DodgersGroup F: Twins, White Sox, Indians, Mariners, Rays, Mets, Braves, Cubs, Rockies, D-BacksGroup C1: AthleticsGroup C2: Blue JaysQuestion: What criterion did I use to organize these teams into these categories?I hope this is challenging; I don&#039;t think looking this up will help, but feel free to try. I&#039;ll give a hint in a while if I think people are having difficulty with it.Hint#1: Two years ago, the Twins would have been in a category by themselves. Six years ago, the Blue Jays would&#039;ve been in that category too. And 12 years ago, the Astros would have been in a category with both of them. I&#039;d call it Group D.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nate, post: 2495079, member: 215161"] Group P: Tigers, Rangers, Red Sox, Orioles, Phillies, Nats, Brewers, Reds, Pirates, Astros, Giants, Padres Group S: Royals, Angels, Yankees, Marlins, Cardinals, Dodgers Group F: Twins, White Sox, Indians, Mariners, Rays, Mets, Braves, Cubs, Rockies, D-Backs Group C1: Athletics Group C2: Blue Jays Question: What criterion did I use to organize these teams into these categories? I hope this is challenging; I don't think looking this up will help, but feel free to try. I'll give a hint in a while if I think people are having difficulty with it. Hint#1: Two years ago, the Twins would have been in a category by themselves. Six years ago, the Blue Jays would've been in that category too. And 12 years ago, the Astros would have been in a category with both of them. I'd call it Group D. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…