Jun 15, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Rant-Whine-Complain-Vent
Can it be argued that simply having sensory perception proves the existence of time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoonNinja" data-source="post: 2530258" data-attributes="member: 799703"><p>I've read a couple arguments concerning our sensory experience, and I agree with the ones that say that sensory perception is merely a representation of reality, that the mind must receive input from our sense to construct an understanding of reality. Yet, the sensory perception would ONLY be a particular understanding of reality, not actually reality in of itself.</p><p></p><p>However, I'm a bit puzzled by the relationship between time and sensory perception.</p><p>What about the temporal progression of sensory perception? </p><p>In order to have any kind of "change" within our thought process or understanding of change, it must occur in time. My brain continually receives information from my senses, and changes its view of the world, and realizing reality within a temporal context. </p><p>If I merely have sensory perception, (lets say we don't actually know if anything experienced within the sensory experience is real) can I argue that I know that time must exist, simply because without it, I am not able to have an experience of sensory perception?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoonNinja, post: 2530258, member: 799703"] I've read a couple arguments concerning our sensory experience, and I agree with the ones that say that sensory perception is merely a representation of reality, that the mind must receive input from our sense to construct an understanding of reality. Yet, the sensory perception would ONLY be a particular understanding of reality, not actually reality in of itself. However, I'm a bit puzzled by the relationship between time and sensory perception. What about the temporal progression of sensory perception? In order to have any kind of "change" within our thought process or understanding of change, it must occur in time. My brain continually receives information from my senses, and changes its view of the world, and realizing reality within a temporal context. If I merely have sensory perception, (lets say we don't actually know if anything experienced within the sensory experience is real) can I argue that I know that time must exist, simply because without it, I am not able to have an experience of sensory perception? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top