Can the flu virus be killed once it has infected the body which some argue

RayRodriguezjr

New member
is impossible b/c purportedly the? virus is not dead or alive & is merely a DNA or RNA strand of the virus neither dead or alive. This view is contrary to every News report ever given regarding the flu shot. Supposedly, the flu shot is always touted as a "dead virus" which is injected into the recipient while the nasal version is touted as a "weakened" weakened version of the virus. Logically speaking, an organism that is dead can't can do no harm; only a live organism has the capacity to do harm. So the illogical belief that states the flu virus can not be killed fly against logic & the information News broadcasters often present in favor of the flu shot who present it as a "dead" virus & the nasal version as "a weakened" version. Whatever is true or not, the point is: there is a natural technique that has proven to effectively terminate every flu symptom in just 2-3 hrs (or less). From what research scientist have disclosed regarding their findings they assert that the virus is alive & that it has the capacity to be killed. That disclosure certainly does not tout it as merely an inactive DNA or RNA strand but a living organism.
But unless one wants to offer a job to one who society has deemed unemployable, don't ask me how this natural technique is employed. That information can not be disclosed in this forum or any other InterNet forum or & for that matter, any other mass medium b/c of the professionally formulated non-disclosure agreement produced by an attorney which one agrees to not disclose in such a forum when they learn this information. Because to do so would bind the dis-closer legally to facing a lawsuit for disclosing what they agreed not to disclose to a third party and/or in a mass medium. Nonetheless, peruse the assertions of the efficacy of these techniques given by the respondents of the following InterNet sites. "Do Not Kill a Fever: Fever Kills Viruses" and "Cure the common cold or flu Using 102* Fevers". The sites & their information are free. But the response to them in favor of a superior method/natural technique is as follows: "the owners of these two sites have a key component right. But, both are missing key elements to their techniques which is why they obtain mixed results. Though obviously, it appears that what they do accomplish is effective enough to lesson their symptoms from 10 days down to 2-3 days--if that! I contend that what they accomplish is strictly accidental. This is why they too would benefit from the more effective natural technique b/c the virus can be killed (contrary to what the misinformed tout regarding a living or non-living organism) in 2.5-3 hrs (or less), not days. With the adaptive feature described in a video, the time required to kill the flu is cut to b/w 1-1.5 hrs rather than several days as proposed in the above sites.
 
Top