Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JanaeLovesBam" data-source="post: 3225946" data-attributes="member: 102814">... I think we need to work on the sequence of events here. The way I see naming and shaming working is: 1. Paedophile is picked up for crime.2. Paedophile goes to jail.3. Paedophile eventually released, and his name published. I may have missed something here, but surely the arrest, conviction and sentence precedes the publication of the name? If you then do something that ensures they are no longer a risk (whether that be execution, life imprisonment, mental conditioning, appropriate implants or other) then the naming and shaming is unnecessary, and simply puts innocents at risk.  That's a different debate entirely.</blockquote>