Jul 11, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Cunning, plotting rapists and pedophiles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mamalicious" data-source="post: 3225952" data-attributes="member: 114544"><p>So, someone with the name GSHAMBROOKE is convicted of paedophilia - not you I should point out, but someone sharing the same name.</p><p> </p><p>As a response your neighbours start getting suspicious of you, and muttering about things. Your children are told by other kids that they're the children of a paedophile. Your boss starts giving you strange looks, and seems to be looking for a reason to fire you. Things go downhill. It doesn't matter that you've never done anything, that you're not the GSHAMBROOKE whose name has been published, that you're innocent.</p><p> </p><p>Your life is now damaged - possibly destroyed - because of someone else's actions.</p><p> </p><p>Now, how much clearer can I make this, I am not advocating against naming and shaming in order to protect paedophiles. I am advocating against it in order to avoid the above situation.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Again - I have in no way been arguing against this, I'm just trying to get through that naming and shaming is not the way to deal with this. There are other ways.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mamalicious, post: 3225952, member: 114544"] So, someone with the name GSHAMBROOKE is convicted of paedophilia - not you I should point out, but someone sharing the same name. As a response your neighbours start getting suspicious of you, and muttering about things. Your children are told by other kids that they're the children of a paedophile. Your boss starts giving you strange looks, and seems to be looking for a reason to fire you. Things go downhill. It doesn't matter that you've never done anything, that you're not the GSHAMBROOKE whose name has been published, that you're innocent. Your life is now damaged - possibly destroyed - because of someone else's actions. Now, how much clearer can I make this, I am not advocating against naming and shaming in order to protect paedophiles. I am advocating against it in order to avoid the above situation. Again - I have in no way been arguing against this, I'm just trying to get through that naming and shaming is not the way to deal with this. There are other ways. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top