Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dodge_ken1025" data-source="post: 3048758" data-attributes="member: 158551">Sigh... ok... Tekkengod... try to follow along.1) err... no one was claiming that you were. Why bother fighting arguments that no one is making?&nbsp; 1) Given how you&#039;ve jumped into the thread no one is really obligated to actually respond to your silly accusations. You&#039;re accusing me when you yourself haven&#039;t offered any viable solutions. Brilliant... but typical.&nbsp;&nbsp; 2) By choosing not to tow the line that the Republican Tom Tancredo is trying to sell... that is doing something. By vocally disagreeing with it and bringing it to peoples attention is doing something. Especially given that the whole context of this thread is what a big, bad warmonger the Democratic presidential candidate Obama. Therefore it is contributing to the thread - whether you can grasp that or not. 3) I&#039;m not somehow required by law provide an alternative. You yourself haven&#039;t even done that... those that live in glass houses... well you get it... so put the rock down bright boy.&nbsp; Given that you&#039;re having trouble understanding the gist of this so far... I&#039;m not even entirely sure you even have a clear cut question that needs to be answered. If you do then present it in clear terms - because to this point you haven&#039;t presented a question/problem and you certainly haven&#039;t presented and answer or a solution.I&#039;m not sure what Aikimac even has to do with this thread... other than it&#039;s you working our your personal grudges/agendas from other threads. Which needless to say... is lame... but not unexpected.4) The whole concept that the US bomb random Muslim holy sites that are situated in sovereign countries that we have diplomatic relations with as a retaliatory response to acts of terrorism is thick headed in the extreme. Not only does it show a frightening lack of understanding of the issues at hand - both economically and strategically... it&#039;s designed for one sole purpose... election year politiking. That both Mecca and Medina are of strategic importance for Americas fuel based economy and global trade makes the idea all the more patently absurd.Politically it shows just how out of touch with reality Republican Tom Tancredo is given that the US is just about to send billions of dollars worth of weapons to Saudi Arabia.&nbsp;So seriously... if you have something to contribute to this thread... then do so. If you have a concise question that you want be to present what I think a viable answer for is then ask it... but your lame and hypocritical accusations only make you look like the resident champion for idiocy.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dodge_ken1025, post: 3048758, member: 158551"] Sigh... ok... Tekkengod... try to follow along. 1) err... no one was claiming that you were. Why bother fighting arguments that no one is making? 1) Given how you've jumped into the thread no one is really obligated to actually respond to your silly accusations. You're accusing me when you yourself haven't offered any viable solutions. Brilliant... but typical. 2) By choosing not to tow the line that the Republican Tom Tancredo is trying to sell... that is doing something. By vocally disagreeing with it and bringing it to peoples attention is doing something. Especially given that the whole context of this thread is what a big, bad warmonger the Democratic presidential candidate Obama. Therefore it is contributing to the thread - whether you can grasp that or not. 3) I'm not somehow required by law provide an alternative. You yourself haven't even done that... those that live in glass houses... well you get it... so put the rock down bright boy. Given that you're having trouble understanding the gist of this so far... I'm not even entirely sure you even have a clear cut question that needs to be answered. If you do then present it in clear terms - because to this point you haven't presented a question/problem and you certainly haven't presented and answer or a solution. I'm not sure what Aikimac even has to do with this thread... other than it's you working our your personal grudges/agendas from other threads. Which needless to say... is lame... but not unexpected. 4) The whole concept that the US bomb random Muslim holy sites that are situated in sovereign countries that we have diplomatic relations with as a retaliatory response to acts of terrorism is thick headed in the extreme. Not only does it show a frightening lack of understanding of the issues at hand - both economically and strategically... it's designed for one sole purpose... election year politiking. That both Mecca and Medina are of strategic importance for Americas fuel based economy and global trade makes the idea all the more patently absurd. Politically it shows just how out of touch with reality Republican Tom Tancredo is given that the US is just about to send billions of dollars worth of weapons to Saudi Arabia. So seriously... if you have something to contribute to this thread... then do so. If you have a concise question that you want be to present what I think a viable answer for is then ask it... but your lame and hypocritical accusations only make you look like the resident champion for idiocy. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…