purely from religion!? A woman (I think her online pseudonym is skepchick) complained about how she was continually harassed at some convention by lustful men (I think it was an atheist convention, too!). Richard Dawkins, in all his glory, posts a reply to her blog, going on and on about how "if she isn't mutilated [via female circumcision] as per religious dogma, then she doesn't have the right to complain about petty things such this."
Harassment??
Petty??
As compared to female circumcision???
WHAT??
@Kagos - are we talking about the same person? He is not a 'user' he is THE Richard Dawkins.
@Chris - I can't find Dawkins comment (it was posted a while ago) but here is Skepchick's reply to his insensitive comments!
Oh yes, he called her a 'MUSLIMA' --- because she dared to be insulted by men's lusts?
http://skepchick.org/2011/07/dear-richard-dawkins/
Harassment??
Petty??
As compared to female circumcision???
WHAT??
@Kagos - are we talking about the same person? He is not a 'user' he is THE Richard Dawkins.
@Chris - I can't find Dawkins comment (it was posted a while ago) but here is Skepchick's reply to his insensitive comments!
Oh yes, he called her a 'MUSLIMA' --- because she dared to be insulted by men's lusts?
http://skepchick.org/2011/07/dear-richard-dawkins/