Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Desiree" data-source="post: 1702313" data-attributes="member: 219155">religion very frustrating? Somebody was just asking about the fact that no evidence of pre-Colombian Hebrew civilizations has ever been found in North, South or Central America. The Mormons believe certain species of domestic animals and refined metals were on the continents in pre-Colombian times but again, no evidence of these have ever been found. The thing I noticed from the Mormon apologists who responded to this question is that they went off on a tangent and started yammering about Nephites, Lamenites and Elohims etc, and Mormon Jesus, you know, all these nouns that don’t appear in any other source of information outside the Mormons magical book and in all likelihood, they’re nothing but made up nonsense. Do you think Mormon apologists are trained to use this response when they get asked questions about the lack of corroborating evidence for their book? Because, it seems quite obvious that this question would get posed to them often so they must be trained to take a standard defensive position, right? This seems to be to use these nouns that Joe Smith, the original Mormon “prophet,” invented to try to confuse people and make them think that “Nephites, Lamenites and Elohims etc,” all these nonsense nouns they use, were real people and beings?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Desiree, post: 1702313, member: 219155"] religion very frustrating? Somebody was just asking about the fact that no evidence of pre-Colombian Hebrew civilizations has ever been found in North, South or Central America. The Mormons believe certain species of domestic animals and refined metals were on the continents in pre-Colombian times but again, no evidence of these have ever been found. The thing I noticed from the Mormon apologists who responded to this question is that they went off on a tangent and started yammering about Nephites, Lamenites and Elohims etc, and Mormon Jesus, you know, all these nouns that don’t appear in any other source of information outside the Mormons magical book and in all likelihood, they’re nothing but made up nonsense. Do you think Mormon apologists are trained to use this response when they get asked questions about the lack of corroborating evidence for their book? Because, it seems quite obvious that this question would get posed to them often so they must be trained to take a standard defensive position, right? This seems to be to use these nouns that Joe Smith, the original Mormon “prophet,” invented to try to confuse people and make them think that “Nephites, Lamenites and Elohims etc,” all these nonsense nouns they use, were real people and beings? [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…