Jul 6, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Introductions
Do you think the Government wants to keep Pot ilegal so the introduction of harder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="heyeeeYOUt" data-source="post: 1948174" data-attributes="member: 713402"><p>drugs may be more prevelent? Therefore in a sick and covert way, encourage the users mentality of thinking to ones self: </p><p>"I'm already high on pot, which is in my system for a MONTH, when this other stuff is out of my system in just a few days..."</p><p>Basically I'm suggesting that the Government WANTS those who buy and smoke pot to be in and around environments that will encourage other substances? Secretly hoping the user will "succumb" so "The War On Drugs" (a 30 Billion Dollar War) can continue?</p><p>Imagine the damage the drug market would feel if all of their "seedlings" were cut from that "soil". Then the government wouldn't be able to keep their ridiculous (War on Drugs) campaign going so strong.</p><p></p><p>What are your thoughts on this argument?</p><p>So far I have two answers...</p><p>One of which claims I have given the government too much credit for their intelligence capabillities. Therefore suggesting it is a rather intelligent question!... The second answerer says I'm making no sense at all... Therefore suggesting that this question is moronic!</p><p></p><p>Odly, I find it difficult to believe that a question can be Intelligent and Moronic! So, clearly there is a major level of discrimination going on between these two answerers. I can only encourage any further answerer's to open your eyes a little wider and see what may really be going on in the eyes of the government.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="heyeeeYOUt, post: 1948174, member: 713402"] drugs may be more prevelent? Therefore in a sick and covert way, encourage the users mentality of thinking to ones self: "I'm already high on pot, which is in my system for a MONTH, when this other stuff is out of my system in just a few days..." Basically I'm suggesting that the Government WANTS those who buy and smoke pot to be in and around environments that will encourage other substances? Secretly hoping the user will "succumb" so "The War On Drugs" (a 30 Billion Dollar War) can continue? Imagine the damage the drug market would feel if all of their "seedlings" were cut from that "soil". Then the government wouldn't be able to keep their ridiculous (War on Drugs) campaign going so strong. What are your thoughts on this argument? So far I have two answers... One of which claims I have given the government too much credit for their intelligence capabillities. Therefore suggesting it is a rather intelligent question!... The second answerer says I'm making no sense at all... Therefore suggesting that this question is moronic! Odly, I find it difficult to believe that a question can be Intelligent and Moronic! So, clearly there is a major level of discrimination going on between these two answerers. I can only encourage any further answerer's to open your eyes a little wider and see what may really be going on in the eyes of the government. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top