Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="guraqt2me" data-source="post: 2095383" data-attributes="member: 255824"><p>No ... not at all.&nbsp; Jesus was never a priest but the son of God or God in the flesh [human form].&nbsp; This has nothing to do with Christ being authorized to preach.&nbsp; Moses, for example, was not a priest but spoke often to the nation of Israel concerning God&#039;s will for them.&nbsp; The role of a priest in Christ&#039;s time was that of the Jewish priests, which was to deal with animal sacrifices, etc.&nbsp; Then, there were the Pharisees - teachers of the Torah or Law.&nbsp; The Bible does have it right in claiming that Jesus was not in the role of a priest - He was much- much, more - a MEDIATOR for our collective sins, as an actual, living sacrifice or offering accepted by God the Father.&nbsp; You are reading too much into this, without checking the background for this statement or verse.&nbsp; Try reading the CONTEXT for this verse then, you will find the meaning.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="guraqt2me, post: 2095383, member: 255824"] No ... not at all. Jesus was never a priest but the son of God or God in the flesh [human form]. This has nothing to do with Christ being authorized to preach. Moses, for example, was not a priest but spoke often to the nation of Israel concerning God's will for them. The role of a priest in Christ's time was that of the Jewish priests, which was to deal with animal sacrifices, etc. Then, there were the Pharisees - teachers of the Torah or Law. The Bible does have it right in claiming that Jesus was not in the role of a priest - He was much- much, more - a MEDIATOR for our collective sins, as an actual, living sacrifice or offering accepted by God the Father. You are reading too much into this, without checking the background for this statement or verse. Try reading the CONTEXT for this verse then, you will find the meaning. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…