Jul 5, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Videos
Video
DIVX
Does WMV take up less memory than a DIVX file?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arish" data-source="post: 370343" data-attributes="member: 162829"><p>The file size entirely depends on the bitrate (Quality/Resolution) and length of the video. I genrally use Divx or MPEG4 for backing up DVD movies on my computer. These codecs offer great compression and speed and I think a video of same resolution and length will result in a smaller file size when encoded with divx compared to wmv. I have somtimes seen that mpeg4 or mp4 files give a better compression than divx and have been using that for about a year now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arish, post: 370343, member: 162829"] The file size entirely depends on the bitrate (Quality/Resolution) and length of the video. I genrally use Divx or MPEG4 for backing up DVD movies on my computer. These codecs offer great compression and speed and I think a video of same resolution and length will result in a smaller file size when encoded with divx compared to wmv. I have somtimes seen that mpeg4 or mp4 files give a better compression than divx and have been using that for about a year now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top