Jul 9, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Evolution Bashing Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="boochocoboy" data-source="post: 2872924" data-attributes="member: 161323"><p>Unfortuantely, I'd say we won't make it to a significantly high state of evolution. Things aren't looking too good for humanity (And the earth) right now.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, back to the topic.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Natural Selection. And please don't quote that website anymore. It's inadmissable evidence. The guy's footnotes quote himself a couple of times, and he uses laws of Thermodynamics to justify his theories on biology. THIS IS NOT REAL SCIENCE. You can't just make **** up and try to glue it together with physics.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>There are lots of other species that evolved from evolution. Like all of them. Everything evolves. It's a fact, established by science without prejudice and now a base concept for an entire discipline (That's biology for those who don't know). Sometimes creationists remind me of holocaust deniers. There's tons of evidence, but they still find a way to slip and slide around the obvious to support their theories. I would just love to videotape a creationist arguing with a University professor in Biology. Ever wonder why there aren't doctoral studies in Creationism? Because it isn't real science! It's a historical anachronism, arguing for an archaic, simplistic solution based on nothing but faith, but trying to propagate it as passable scientific proof!</p><p></p><p>Sorry for the rant, but this is frustrating to me. So many people arguing over this with no idea of what they're talking about. If you just believe on faith, just say that, and that's fine with me. Look at my first post here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>People having religious beliefs is fine, but when you try to prove science wrong with invented, poorly written ********, I get frustrated. So please, make it clear what you're trying to say. If you just believe, then keep believing. I have no right to tell you what to believe. But don't try to contravene decades of legitimate scientific research and experimentation. You just look bad.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="boochocoboy, post: 2872924, member: 161323"] Unfortuantely, I'd say we won't make it to a significantly high state of evolution. Things aren't looking too good for humanity (And the earth) right now. Anyways, back to the topic. Natural Selection. And please don't quote that website anymore. It's inadmissable evidence. The guy's footnotes quote himself a couple of times, and he uses laws of Thermodynamics to justify his theories on biology. THIS IS NOT REAL SCIENCE. You can't just make **** up and try to glue it together with physics. There are lots of other species that evolved from evolution. Like all of them. Everything evolves. It's a fact, established by science without prejudice and now a base concept for an entire discipline (That's biology for those who don't know). Sometimes creationists remind me of holocaust deniers. There's tons of evidence, but they still find a way to slip and slide around the obvious to support their theories. I would just love to videotape a creationist arguing with a University professor in Biology. Ever wonder why there aren't doctoral studies in Creationism? Because it isn't real science! It's a historical anachronism, arguing for an archaic, simplistic solution based on nothing but faith, but trying to propagate it as passable scientific proof! Sorry for the rant, but this is frustrating to me. So many people arguing over this with no idea of what they're talking about. If you just believe on faith, just say that, and that's fine with me. Look at my first post here. People having religious beliefs is fine, but when you try to prove science wrong with invented, poorly written ********, I get frustrated. So please, make it clear what you're trying to say. If you just believe, then keep believing. I have no right to tell you what to believe. But don't try to contravene decades of legitimate scientific research and experimentation. You just look bad. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top