Jul 9, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Evolution Bashing Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ny21tb" data-source="post: 2873001" data-attributes="member: 154254"><p>Right. New day.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Congratulations. That's basic cellular biology, and proves nothing about your case. And as far as the bible being a source of science, I'm afraid I disagree. It's been rewritten and translated so many times that it's almost impossible to quote it as the original word handed down. As a religious document, it's fine, but as historical or scientific record, it's basically inadmissable.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I'm afraid I don't quite understand. You're saying that all scientific research must be divinely inspired? Just because something is complicated, a person couldn't have possibly figured it out for themselves through research and experimentation, and it must have come from GOD ABOVE!</p><p></p><p>Congratulations on discrediting the very research you were trying to quote to prove your point.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry son, but religious points are inadmissable here. We're talking about the science of each point. Someone else on this board put it best earlier, so I'm only quoting them, but here goes: Religious arguments prove nothing but the faith of the writer. Religion has no bearing on the scientific conflict in this thread.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ny21tb, post: 2873001, member: 154254"] Right. New day. Congratulations. That's basic cellular biology, and proves nothing about your case. And as far as the bible being a source of science, I'm afraid I disagree. It's been rewritten and translated so many times that it's almost impossible to quote it as the original word handed down. As a religious document, it's fine, but as historical or scientific record, it's basically inadmissable. I'm afraid I don't quite understand. You're saying that all scientific research must be divinely inspired? Just because something is complicated, a person couldn't have possibly figured it out for themselves through research and experimentation, and it must have come from GOD ABOVE! Congratulations on discrediting the very research you were trying to quote to prove your point. Sorry son, but religious points are inadmissable here. We're talking about the science of each point. Someone else on this board put it best earlier, so I'm only quoting them, but here goes: Religious arguments prove nothing but the faith of the writer. Religion has no bearing on the scientific conflict in this thread. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top