Jul 9, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Evolution Bashing Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BOOMERSOONERFANttt" data-source="post: 2873160" data-attributes="member: 109640"><p>The article gets off to a bad start real quick with this quote: "The theory of creation, in fact, has more support from the fundamental laws of physics than does evolution, in particular the second law of thermodynamics."</p><p></p><p>Since this statement does not reflect a very fundimental undestanding of Physics and things go down hill from there.</p><p></p><p>Simply the second law of thermodynamics is best demonstated in simple closed systems. The solar system is a closed system. The second law of thermodynamics would apply to the WHOLE system, but it gets very complicated and beyond the scope of this debate. The energy from the sun and the internal heat of the earth is far more energy required for evolution to take place on the earth and possibly Mars. There is no question that energy transfers in terms of chemical reactions take place from these energy sources all the time allowing more than enough energy than is needed for abiogenisis and evolution to take place. This very basic elementary physics and chemestry is learned in college. If people do not have a good grasp of basic science the rest of the arguement is literally hopless and foolish.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BOOMERSOONERFANttt, post: 2873160, member: 109640"] The article gets off to a bad start real quick with this quote: "The theory of creation, in fact, has more support from the fundamental laws of physics than does evolution, in particular the second law of thermodynamics." Since this statement does not reflect a very fundimental undestanding of Physics and things go down hill from there. Simply the second law of thermodynamics is best demonstated in simple closed systems. The solar system is a closed system. The second law of thermodynamics would apply to the WHOLE system, but it gets very complicated and beyond the scope of this debate. The energy from the sun and the internal heat of the earth is far more energy required for evolution to take place on the earth and possibly Mars. There is no question that energy transfers in terms of chemical reactions take place from these energy sources all the time allowing more than enough energy than is needed for abiogenisis and evolution to take place. This very basic elementary physics and chemestry is learned in college. If people do not have a good grasp of basic science the rest of the arguement is literally hopless and foolish. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top