Jul 7, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Rant-Whine-Complain-Vent
evolution debate/rant?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris P" data-source="post: 434303"><p>okay, </p><p>yahoo answers--- science and mathematics--biology </p><p>is by definition a scientific forum; yet people still insist on writing creationist stuff in answer to serious questions. fair play people are entitled to beliefs, but belief is theology not science. science is based around evidence, theology is based on a more spiritual plane. there is pretty darn conclusive proof that evolution occured, such as fossil records and homologous stuctures, yet god hasnt appeared in 2000 years. which is more likely?</p><p>and if god made man in his own image, how come all men look different. they 'should' all look like eachother, and god for that reason. doesnt that slightly ruin the point?</p><p>final rant point here, how come if man was first, how come he is almost last in the fossil record?</p><p></p><p>can we keep it 'science' here please, unless you have conclusive evidence?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris P, post: 434303"] okay, yahoo answers--- science and mathematics--biology is by definition a scientific forum; yet people still insist on writing creationist stuff in answer to serious questions. fair play people are entitled to beliefs, but belief is theology not science. science is based around evidence, theology is based on a more spiritual plane. there is pretty darn conclusive proof that evolution occured, such as fossil records and homologous stuctures, yet god hasnt appeared in 2000 years. which is more likely? and if god made man in his own image, how come all men look different. they 'should' all look like eachother, and god for that reason. doesnt that slightly ruin the point? final rant point here, how come if man was first, how come he is almost last in the fossil record? can we keep it 'science' here please, unless you have conclusive evidence? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top