Jun 16, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Random Interesting Topics
Freed on appeal; will Mr. Hodgson have enough compo for himself after paying
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="harryr" data-source="post: 1698959" data-attributes="member: 237227"><p>for his 27 year 'lodgings'? </p><p>Aye...the press will run with 'But he was a bit of a fibber by all accounts & owned up to several other crimes including murder(s), what were the Police supposed to do?' line until the cows come home. Does this mean before the police 'who didn't know what to do' - unlike the police in Birmingham and Guildford a few years earlier to certain (level-headed) Irish personnel - could have got in touch with psychiatrists and put him under observation rather than rushing him off to court, presuming they had 'got a result'. Was that not the problem with the police during the 70's and 80's - if the con they had in front of them said 'yea...it was me' - either by force or not, then it was a quick progression through the courts?</p><p>He should have had help in 1982...but hey - in the sweet rose-glasses period of time gone by - even hospitals were too keen to treat such people.</p><p>Sorry - excuse my writing. "...even hospitals were NOT that keen to treat such people."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="harryr, post: 1698959, member: 237227"] for his 27 year 'lodgings'? Aye...the press will run with 'But he was a bit of a fibber by all accounts & owned up to several other crimes including murder(s), what were the Police supposed to do?' line until the cows come home. Does this mean before the police 'who didn't know what to do' - unlike the police in Birmingham and Guildford a few years earlier to certain (level-headed) Irish personnel - could have got in touch with psychiatrists and put him under observation rather than rushing him off to court, presuming they had 'got a result'. Was that not the problem with the police during the 70's and 80's - if the con they had in front of them said 'yea...it was me' - either by force or not, then it was a quick progression through the courts? He should have had help in 1982...but hey - in the sweet rose-glasses period of time gone by - even hospitals were too keen to treat such people. Sorry - excuse my writing. "...even hospitals were NOT that keen to treat such people." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top