Jul 8, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Good things about Islam?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lmao" data-source="post: 2953973" data-attributes="member: 104651"><p>Homer,</p><p></p><p>I think we're at a pretty good agree to disagree point. However in terms of Harris:</p><p></p><p>I urge you to return to my original posting on this subject are read some of Harris's secular critics.</p><p></p><p>His falicies include:</p><p>- Not addressing culture or history in his analitical mode</p><p>- Reducing everything to relgion -- including stating that communism is a religion in order to make it fit into his analysis</p><p>- Ignoring all other research done in these areas</p><p>- Failing to address the authoritarian thread of his own writing -- one that essentially allows for a militeristic reading of his own texts.</p><p></p><p>Those are my points.</p><p></p><p>- Matt</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lmao, post: 2953973, member: 104651"] Homer, I think we're at a pretty good agree to disagree point. However in terms of Harris: I urge you to return to my original posting on this subject are read some of Harris's secular critics. His falicies include: - Not addressing culture or history in his analitical mode - Reducing everything to relgion -- including stating that communism is a religion in order to make it fit into his analysis - Ignoring all other research done in these areas - Failing to address the authoritarian thread of his own writing -- one that essentially allows for a militeristic reading of his own texts. Those are my points. - Matt [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top