Jul 11, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Hillary nutcracker
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sebastiant" data-source="post: 3094365" data-attributes="member: 104180"><p>How about some backing up of this statement? sources?</p><p>I'm afraid you shouldn't try to intuit economic relationships because most things have surprising and sometimes counterintuitive and very complex relationships; basically in economics appearance is not reality so you need some plausible application of theory and credible sources. Otherwise you end up making statements like the above.</p><p></p><p>Frankly alot of your posts these days sound like your parroting some propaganda video on youtube.</p><p></p><p>The thing is if you had actually read any decent cost-benefit analysis of government subsidized health care you would be talking about something along the lines of trade offs or an over all net cost or benefit, instead you present a post with the implicit premise that state healthcare is unhealthy for the economy. Your statement really is the equivalent of DustinJolley saying all atheists are liberals. </p><p></p><p>You mock Dustinjolley for taking irrational and ignorant positions yet you continue to do the same yourself. Are you not capable of applying the same standards of reason you espouse on threads about fake ninja masters and Fox news to your own beliefs?</p><p></p><p>I don't mean to insult you personally, you seem like a decent guy, but you are being something of a hypocrite.</p><p></p><p>So in the name of intellectual integrity, why do you make the above </p><p>statement?</p><p></p><p>From a pervious thread:</p><p> I'm going to hold you to this</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sebastiant, post: 3094365, member: 104180"] How about some backing up of this statement? sources? I'm afraid you shouldn't try to intuit economic relationships because most things have surprising and sometimes counterintuitive and very complex relationships; basically in economics appearance is not reality so you need some plausible application of theory and credible sources. Otherwise you end up making statements like the above. Frankly alot of your posts these days sound like your parroting some propaganda video on youtube. The thing is if you had actually read any decent cost-benefit analysis of government subsidized health care you would be talking about something along the lines of trade offs or an over all net cost or benefit, instead you present a post with the implicit premise that state healthcare is unhealthy for the economy. Your statement really is the equivalent of DustinJolley saying all atheists are liberals. You mock Dustinjolley for taking irrational and ignorant positions yet you continue to do the same yourself. Are you not capable of applying the same standards of reason you espouse on threads about fake ninja masters and Fox news to your own beliefs? I don't mean to insult you personally, you seem like a decent guy, but you are being something of a hypocrite. So in the name of intellectual integrity, why do you make the above statement? From a pervious thread: I'm going to hold you to this [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top