Jun 15, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lifestyle
Travel and Vacation
How does travelling faster than the speed of light mean time travel?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BigDaddy1" data-source="post: 2645603" data-attributes="member: 228422"><p>First of all, it's not a necessary conclusion. If you're using physics (special relativity in this case) that *depends* on the vacuum speed of light to be a true barrier, then using those same physics to draw a conclusion from an impossibility is not necessarily valid.</p><p></p><p>The main argument for this relies on using special relativity to show that if you have faster-than-light transport in some inertial frame, then it is possible to find a different inertial frame where that same transport is backward in time. </p><p></p><p>If you've never worked with Minkowski diagrams, then this link might not mean much to you, but for those familiar with them you can see how the presence of a single faster-than-light transport path allows for time loops to appear.</p><p></p><p>http://www.theculture.org/rich/sharpblue/archives/000089.html</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BigDaddy1, post: 2645603, member: 228422"] First of all, it's not a necessary conclusion. If you're using physics (special relativity in this case) that *depends* on the vacuum speed of light to be a true barrier, then using those same physics to draw a conclusion from an impossibility is not necessarily valid. The main argument for this relies on using special relativity to show that if you have faster-than-light transport in some inertial frame, then it is possible to find a different inertial frame where that same transport is backward in time. If you've never worked with Minkowski diagrams, then this link might not mean much to you, but for those familiar with them you can see how the presence of a single faster-than-light transport path allows for time loops to appear. http://www.theculture.org/rich/sharpblue/archives/000089.html [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top