Jun 16, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Rant-Whine-Complain-Vent
How many independents scooted to the left after Wilson whined last night?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WaterOverGold" data-source="post: 2008781" data-attributes="member: 639207"><p>Believe it or not this was not as bad for Wilson as you seem to assume.</p><p></p><p>Many people, though they won't say it in public, were relieved to see at least ONE representative stand up and say something in the face of Obama's bullsh"t. Was is the wrong venue?? Yes. Was the sentiment sincere and mostly accurate?? Yes.</p><p></p><p>http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/letters/bal-healthletter0910,0,5949222.story</p><p>President Obama is clear: No illegal aliens will be covered by the proposed health care reforms. That is probably not technically a lie. But the president also knows that is not how it will work in practice. It is another application of "Don't ask, Don't tell."</p><p></p><p>If it is absolutely true that illegal aliens are not to be covered, then why did Democrats in a House committee on July 30th vote against an amendment, offered by Rep. Nathan Deal, that would have required health care providers to use a verification program to prevent illegal aliens from receiving government-provided health care services? While all Republicans and five Democrats on the committee voted for it, 29 Democrats voted against it, killing the amendment.</p><p></p><p>EDIT:</p><p></p><p>PERHAPS, you should read the WHOLE article:</p><p></p><p>"There's no provision for how the prohibition would be enforced, or any requirement for people to prove they are citizens or legal residents before getting health care benefits. In fact, Democrats on the Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees defeated Republican-offered amendments that would have required people to verify their legal status before getting care, with some Democrats saying such requirements would be unnecessarily burdensome for people legally entitled to coverage. Wilson cited the defeat of those two amendments Thursday when he discussed his outburst with reporters."</p><p></p><p>Dems SAY it won't cover illegals. But they're not going to ask for proof of citizenship. So TECHNICALLY they're correct. REALISTICALLY they're DEAD WRONG if the say it won't cover illegals.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WaterOverGold, post: 2008781, member: 639207"] Believe it or not this was not as bad for Wilson as you seem to assume. Many people, though they won't say it in public, were relieved to see at least ONE representative stand up and say something in the face of Obama's bullsh"t. Was is the wrong venue?? Yes. Was the sentiment sincere and mostly accurate?? Yes. http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/letters/bal-healthletter0910,0,5949222.story President Obama is clear: No illegal aliens will be covered by the proposed health care reforms. That is probably not technically a lie. But the president also knows that is not how it will work in practice. It is another application of "Don't ask, Don't tell." If it is absolutely true that illegal aliens are not to be covered, then why did Democrats in a House committee on July 30th vote against an amendment, offered by Rep. Nathan Deal, that would have required health care providers to use a verification program to prevent illegal aliens from receiving government-provided health care services? While all Republicans and five Democrats on the committee voted for it, 29 Democrats voted against it, killing the amendment. EDIT: PERHAPS, you should read the WHOLE article: "There's no provision for how the prohibition would be enforced, or any requirement for people to prove they are citizens or legal residents before getting health care benefits. In fact, Democrats on the Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees defeated Republican-offered amendments that would have required people to verify their legal status before getting care, with some Democrats saying such requirements would be unnecessarily burdensome for people legally entitled to coverage. Wilson cited the defeat of those two amendments Thursday when he discussed his outburst with reporters." Dems SAY it won't cover illegals. But they're not going to ask for proof of citizenship. So TECHNICALLY they're correct. REALISTICALLY they're DEAD WRONG if the say it won't cover illegals. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top