Jun 16, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Identify and discuss two inefficiency of tarif?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CheerUp" data-source="post: 1994091" data-attributes="member: 719898"><p>Is this a general tariff on all imports, or a specific tariff only on a specific product?</p><p></p><p>A general tariff that lasted over 100 years is what made the USA prosperous, frim 1787 to 1913. Does that sound very inefficient? It only made us an industrial superpower exporter and a creditor nation. That sounds pretty efficient to me.</p><p></p><p>So the question must be concerning specific tariffs. That kind of tariff usually does more harm than good. It benefits only those who make that item, while raising prices for everybody. </p><p></p><p>A general tariff raises prices on all goods, so the free market is preserved. A specific tariff distorts the free market by raising the price on only one product while leaving others unchanged. </p><p></p><p>The purpose of a tariff is to restore balanced trade. So any tariff is inefficient if it fails to achieve this purpose.</p><p></p><p>The most inefficient tariff is one like the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930. We already had a trade surplus then, so a tariff was uncalled for. That caused our trading partners to retaliate by refusing to buy our exports. That was really really inefficient.</p><p></p><p>So tariffs must be applied wisely to be efficient. A poorly managed tariff can be inefficient.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CheerUp, post: 1994091, member: 719898"] Is this a general tariff on all imports, or a specific tariff only on a specific product? A general tariff that lasted over 100 years is what made the USA prosperous, frim 1787 to 1913. Does that sound very inefficient? It only made us an industrial superpower exporter and a creditor nation. That sounds pretty efficient to me. So the question must be concerning specific tariffs. That kind of tariff usually does more harm than good. It benefits only those who make that item, while raising prices for everybody. A general tariff raises prices on all goods, so the free market is preserved. A specific tariff distorts the free market by raising the price on only one product while leaving others unchanged. The purpose of a tariff is to restore balanced trade. So any tariff is inefficient if it fails to achieve this purpose. The most inefficient tariff is one like the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930. We already had a trade surplus then, so a tariff was uncalled for. That caused our trading partners to retaliate by refusing to buy our exports. That was really really inefficient. So tariffs must be applied wisely to be efficient. A poorly managed tariff can be inefficient. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top