...does science suffer? If a person makes a profit from "Global Warming", can they be a credible source of information, or do they become a shill for 'Big Environment'?
Even if it's something small like running a blog site or reviewing products for corporations, can they still remain objective, and can they still evaluate data with an open mind?
Or does their business and the strive for profits prevent them from correctly evaluating the science?
Shouldn't those who profit from "Global Warming" be excluded from commenting on the subject? After all, it's clear that they will do what is needed to protect their profits and will naturally be biased in their views. Right?
Even if it's something small like running a blog site or reviewing products for corporations, can they still remain objective, and can they still evaluate data with an open mind?
Or does their business and the strive for profits prevent them from correctly evaluating the science?
Shouldn't those who profit from "Global Warming" be excluded from commenting on the subject? After all, it's clear that they will do what is needed to protect their profits and will naturally be biased in their views. Right?