Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="spoon737" data-source="post: 1628820" data-attributes="member: 590038">Why did you feel the need to ask this question four times?&nbsp; I answered the first time you asked this, but I may as well reiterate my point.&nbsp; Infinity is not necessary to put finite quantities into context.&nbsp; The mind is capable of assigning a value to a collection of objects which represents their quantity.&nbsp; This ability becomes more concrete when we realize that different collections of objects are comparable based on the difference in their quantities.&nbsp; These concepts are fundamental to mathematics, so much so that preschool aged children are able to understand them.&nbsp; No part of this concept involves infinity.&nbsp; Infinity does not put the idea of quantity into any new kind of context at this level.Small children do not have the cognitive ability to perceive infinity.&nbsp; Aside from what I learned in the child development course I took way back in my first year of college, I know this because when faced with the idea of eternity/infinity, kids always want to know how big it is.&nbsp; The very fact that they are asking how big infinity is means they don&#039;t understand it, because infinity cannot be accurately described in terms of size.&nbsp; Size implies a boundary, a restriction, something that infinity does not have.&nbsp; And yet, these very same children DO have an understanding of numbers.&nbsp; Sure, it&#039;s basic, but it&#039;s there.So we have examples of ancient civilizations with a developed sense of mathematics and small children who are capable of understanding quantity, neither of which had/have any real understanding of infinity.&nbsp; How then can you claim that the concept of the infinite is necessary to give context to numbers?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="spoon737, post: 1628820, member: 590038"] Why did you feel the need to ask this question four times? I answered the first time you asked this, but I may as well reiterate my point. Infinity is not necessary to put finite quantities into context. The mind is capable of assigning a value to a collection of objects which represents their quantity. This ability becomes more concrete when we realize that different collections of objects are comparable based on the difference in their quantities. These concepts are fundamental to mathematics, so much so that preschool aged children are able to understand them. No part of this concept involves infinity. Infinity does not put the idea of quantity into any new kind of context at this level. Small children do not have the cognitive ability to perceive infinity. Aside from what I learned in the child development course I took way back in my first year of college, I know this because when faced with the idea of eternity/infinity, kids always want to know how big it is. The very fact that they are asking how big infinity is means they don't understand it, because infinity cannot be accurately described in terms of size. Size implies a boundary, a restriction, something that infinity does not have. And yet, these very same children DO have an understanding of numbers. Sure, it's basic, but it's there. So we have examples of ancient civilizations with a developed sense of mathematics and small children who are capable of understanding quantity, neither of which had/have any real understanding of infinity. How then can you claim that the concept of the infinite is necessary to give context to numbers? [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…