mythkillerlzuba
New member
- Aug 29, 2008
- 15
- 0
- 1
...disciples against his enemies? If your Christ in your Bible was crucified, are you sure you are reading the Bible the way it is meant to be read?
Have you ever attempted to read the four Gospels as One Gospel about the success of the Christ who preached his whole Gospel, and had his disciples go out and preach his whole Gospel, without a crucifixion?
Have you ever attempted to read the four Gospel accounts as one Gospel account of the Christ's warning of danger to his disciples, and his successful planning, and his successful execution of his plans to evade crucifixion?
Have you ever?
If you haven't then, are you prepared to open your eyes and to see the wonderful planning and the great success of the Christ who defeated his enemies and evaded crucifixion, in the Bible that you might have read and failed to see?
This question is not about Jesus, is it?
And does the Bible not tell you in Matthew and in Luke that "Jesus" was not the name of the baby Christ?
Does the Bible not tell you that,
Yes! Jesus died on the cross?
Both of them?
But Christ was declared innocent of all false accusations and was free to leave and was not crucified and did not bear a cross?
Don't the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John tell you that Jesus was the name that Pontius Pilate invented from Jah and Zeus in his crucifixion of two thieves? For the two thieves?
Does not the Bible tell you that Pontius Pilate punished the High Priest with a double-crucifixion on the Sabbath?
And that Pontius Pilate had the High Priest and his Chief Priests accept the Sabbath-crucifixion of the thieves as their fault?
And that Pontius Pilate had them accept that their children should suffer for the blood of the Jesus thieves?
Do you read your Bible the way it was meant to be read or not?
Have you ever attempted to read the four Gospels as One Gospel about the success of the Christ who preached his whole Gospel, and had his disciples go out and preach his whole Gospel, without a crucifixion?
Have you ever attempted to read the four Gospel accounts as one Gospel account of the Christ's warning of danger to his disciples, and his successful planning, and his successful execution of his plans to evade crucifixion?
Have you ever?
If you haven't then, are you prepared to open your eyes and to see the wonderful planning and the great success of the Christ who defeated his enemies and evaded crucifixion, in the Bible that you might have read and failed to see?
This question is not about Jesus, is it?
And does the Bible not tell you in Matthew and in Luke that "Jesus" was not the name of the baby Christ?
Does the Bible not tell you that,
Yes! Jesus died on the cross?
Both of them?
But Christ was declared innocent of all false accusations and was free to leave and was not crucified and did not bear a cross?
Don't the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John tell you that Jesus was the name that Pontius Pilate invented from Jah and Zeus in his crucifixion of two thieves? For the two thieves?
Does not the Bible tell you that Pontius Pilate punished the High Priest with a double-crucifixion on the Sabbath?
And that Pontius Pilate had the High Priest and his Chief Priests accept the Sabbath-crucifixion of the thieves as their fault?
And that Pontius Pilate had them accept that their children should suffer for the blood of the Jesus thieves?
Do you read your Bible the way it was meant to be read or not?