Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RayBalthazar" data-source="post: 2630101" data-attributes="member: 881228">...prediction like a prophet would use? If you state that you do not believe in god because you have no proof is the reverse any more logical? Is that a definitive reason for a non-belief or belief or are both just an argument from ignorance (Draws a conclusion based on lack of knowledge or evidence without accounting for all possibilities)Logic is like mathematics it is consistent 1+1 always =2 not 1+1=2 99% of the time and 1+1=11 on 1% of special occasions or when it furthers an issue.Stating there is or is not a god is just a prediction based on probabilities totally dependent on who is looking where and when neither opinion is valid or invalid and both are null and void. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but not their own truth.If anyone sees logical contradictions- which is the only case that i can think of that requires no biased assumptions -in believing in God, let he/she show them ... they would certainly be remembered forever.(i.e. Deduction without assumption is not possible here)Summary: in a heads-god/tails-no god, coin toss-where the probability of heads/tails is not known and cannot be known - each prediction of the outcome is as efficient as the other. It would be moronic to reticule someones prediction over your own. That much should be obvious!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RayBalthazar, post: 2630101, member: 881228"] ...prediction like a prophet would use? If you state that you do not believe in god because you have no proof is the reverse any more logical? Is that a definitive reason for a non-belief or belief or are both just an argument from ignorance (Draws a conclusion based on lack of knowledge or evidence without accounting for all possibilities) Logic is like mathematics it is consistent 1+1 always =2 not 1+1=2 99% of the time and 1+1=11 on 1% of special occasions or when it furthers an issue. Stating there is or is not a god is just a prediction based on probabilities totally dependent on who is looking where and when neither opinion is valid or invalid and both are null and void. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but not their own truth. If anyone sees logical contradictions- which is the only case that i can think of that requires no biased assumptions -in believing in God, let he/she show them ... they would certainly be remembered forever.(i.e. Deduction without assumption is not possible here) Summary: in a heads-god/tails-no god, coin toss-where the probability of heads/tails is not known and cannot be known - each prediction of the outcome is as efficient as the other. It would be moronic to reticule someones prediction over your own. That much should be obvious! [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…