Jul 7, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lifestyle
Style Lab
Is there a recent trend towards recognising more dialects as languages?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="grayure" data-source="post: 2203520" data-attributes="member: 407863"><p>It seems to me that it's more common than it used to be for particular ways of speaking to be categorised as languages rather than dialects recently. For instance, Scots and English are now often differentiated whereas previously they weren't, Asturian is seen as different than Castilian and the Okinawa dialect is sometimes seen as separate than the Japanese spoken in Tokyo. But if i hear Asturian, i can't say it's really so different than Castilian, and Scots (not Scots Gaelic!) and English are surely not so different either, though as a semi-Scot i'm very attached to the idea that it's a different language, let's face it, it's not like it's West Frisian. So, is there something like a nationalistic or other political motive behind this? I just don't find it very convincing that they're all really mutually incomprehensible.</p><p>Thanks, yes i know the saying (oddly appropriate that it should be Yiddish though!), but is there a recent trend in that direction? Is it because people are making themselves heard or attaching more importance than before to their particular style of speech?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="grayure, post: 2203520, member: 407863"] It seems to me that it's more common than it used to be for particular ways of speaking to be categorised as languages rather than dialects recently. For instance, Scots and English are now often differentiated whereas previously they weren't, Asturian is seen as different than Castilian and the Okinawa dialect is sometimes seen as separate than the Japanese spoken in Tokyo. But if i hear Asturian, i can't say it's really so different than Castilian, and Scots (not Scots Gaelic!) and English are surely not so different either, though as a semi-Scot i'm very attached to the idea that it's a different language, let's face it, it's not like it's West Frisian. So, is there something like a nationalistic or other political motive behind this? I just don't find it very convincing that they're all really mutually incomprehensible. Thanks, yes i know the saying (oddly appropriate that it should be Yiddish though!), but is there a recent trend in that direction? Is it because people are making themselves heard or attaching more importance than before to their particular style of speech? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top