Jun 15, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Introductions
Is this a good introduction paragraph and conclusion?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MasterofNothing" data-source="post: 2626880" data-attributes="member: 890672"><p>For english class we are writing a paper about the national spirit the author (Jon Krakauer) gives expression to in the book Into the Wild. I have written my my whole paper basically but now I want your insight on my introduction and conclusion. Is it good? Bad? How should I make it better? Etc...</p><p></p><p>Intro:</p><p> Many stories of legends consist of national spirits. A national spirit can be generally described as what or how the ideal person should be in these stories but also how people should be in life. To express the national spirits, writers often create heroes to the legends to illustrate his or her opinion on what the national spirit should be. Jon Krakauer, the writer of the bestselling novel, Into the Wild, suggests independence from society as the national spirit he refers to in this book. Throughout this non-fiction story Krakauer brings up many characters that express this ideal he refers to.</p><p></p><p>Conclusion:</p><p> Many evidence throughout this non-fictional biography supports independence from society as the national spirit Jon Krakauer gives expression to. Krakauer wants this concept of being independent from society formally mended in the reader's mind throughout reading this book of a life about a man. He does this so the readers can firmly know and understand at the end of the book why many people throughout the world, like Chris, throw their life away to live in the conditions and hardships that these people do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MasterofNothing, post: 2626880, member: 890672"] For english class we are writing a paper about the national spirit the author (Jon Krakauer) gives expression to in the book Into the Wild. I have written my my whole paper basically but now I want your insight on my introduction and conclusion. Is it good? Bad? How should I make it better? Etc... Intro: Many stories of legends consist of national spirits. A national spirit can be generally described as what or how the ideal person should be in these stories but also how people should be in life. To express the national spirits, writers often create heroes to the legends to illustrate his or her opinion on what the national spirit should be. Jon Krakauer, the writer of the bestselling novel, Into the Wild, suggests independence from society as the national spirit he refers to in this book. Throughout this non-fiction story Krakauer brings up many characters that express this ideal he refers to. Conclusion: Many evidence throughout this non-fictional biography supports independence from society as the national spirit Jon Krakauer gives expression to. Krakauer wants this concept of being independent from society formally mended in the reader's mind throughout reading this book of a life about a man. He does this so the readers can firmly know and understand at the end of the book why many people throughout the world, like Chris, throw their life away to live in the conditions and hardships that these people do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top