He calls people 'males' and 'females' on a regular basis. He knows that is insulting to the majority of people. How can he be a moral person? I think that he's packed with hatred.
to *: that's a 5 star comedy. I love it
Dawkins denies design. He says that there's no design in the universe, just the "appearance of design". But that's insane. You just can't logically and realistically deny that there's design all through the universe. That alone should rule Dawkins out to any thinking human being. Design is all around us. . You have to be blind not to see it. There are branches of science that basically just study the design in nature.........scientific disciplines such as nano-technology and bio-mimicry. These disciplines study the design in nature.......whales,bats,dolphins... have sonar.......and try to create machines that mimic that design. There’s even a weekly program on the science channel that looks at the design in nature trying to find leads for technology. In the labs around the world biologists are studying birds, insects, bats and even flying dinasoars for new ideas to improve planes for the future. . Everywhere you look there's design. Where there's design there's got to be a designer. That's just common sense. Creation is not an unproven theory. It's a common sense fact that we come to by just using a little logic and reason.
You look at bats. They do not fly by sight. They can barely see in the day but they sleep in the day. They are nocturnal creatures. They do all their activities at night and at night they are blind. They fly by means of sonar. They send out sound waves through their nose as they are flying. If those sound waves bounce off something and come back at them, they pick them up and know that they are heading toward something and need to veer in a different direction. Somehow they know how fast they are flying and they know that sound travels at 761.2 MPH and as they fly they continue to send out sound waves so they continue to get updated information. Given enough info(and continued updated info) a mathematician could sit down with a pencil and paper and some calculus equations and figure out how far the bat was from the object and with the right info could even figure out if the object the bat is heading toward is stationary or moving toward the bat or away from it. But that would take time and if the bat took that much time he’d be flying into trees and telephone poles other things. We have developed computers that can do that in a second. That's what sonar is all about. The bat has a computer in his head that can figure that info out in a nanosecond. It knows what it is heading for without being able to physically see. It's flying by instruments(as pilots would say).
Dolphins and whales also have sonar. But the computer in the dolphins and whales heads are programmed differently than the computer in the bats head because sound travels at a different speed in water than in air. That makes all the difference in the world. The idea that the sonar equipment that is in the bats head just came about by random chance(read....luck) natural processes is beyond belief. But do you really believe that the sonar equipment could come about again, a second time, independently in the dolphin and whales head just by random chance? You do if you are Richard Dawkins or any atheist for that matter. I say the idea that it could come about once by random chance is beyond belief. To Dawkins, belief in God is a projection of human longings and a type of wish-fulfillment. Such an argument works against atheism as well since an atheist wishes there is no God and therefore believes there is no God.