Ive looked at the review for killzone 2 and i was shocked to see 8.8 out of 10. when i played the demo the game was amazing. best FPS i have ever played.
Then, i heard that most of the web-sights were biased and the people who wrote the reviews were xbox 360 fan boys who were more into gears of war 2 and halo 3. They didn't want to admit killzone 2 was better than gears of war 2 and halo 3 combined. So, they wrote ridiculous CONS such as:
no co-op - (Who cares, there's online multiplayer )
no keyboard support- (Does it really matter?)
bad storyline - (why was the story line bad?)
dont need to change weapons that much - (well, i did!)
maps were not that imaginative - (what the hell are you talking about!!!)
Then, i heard that most of the web-sights were biased and the people who wrote the reviews were xbox 360 fan boys who were more into gears of war 2 and halo 3. They didn't want to admit killzone 2 was better than gears of war 2 and halo 3 combined. So, they wrote ridiculous CONS such as:
no co-op - (Who cares, there's online multiplayer )
no keyboard support- (Does it really matter?)
bad storyline - (why was the story line bad?)
dont need to change weapons that much - (well, i did!)
maps were not that imaginative - (what the hell are you talking about!!!)