Jun 17, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Information & News
RSS News
Health and Fitness
Ky. House Committee Rejects Abortion Ultrasound Bill For Fourth Consecutive Year
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tD33NAt" data-source="post: 2106295" data-attributes="member: 124445"><p>The Kentucky Health and Welfare Committee has rejected a prescriptive bill (SB 38) that would have required abortion providers to perform an ultrasound and offer the woman a chance to view the image before the procedure, the Louisville Courier-Journal reports (Yetter, Louisville Courier-Journal, 2/26). According to the bill text, the physician or an ultrasound technician would have been required to describe the image in detail, including "the dimensions of the embryo or fetus and the presence of external members and internal organs, if present and viewable" (Bill text, 3/1)... <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8OVUCKlEpq84wOYBRmP8D-WmIc/0/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8OVUCKlEpq84wOYBRmP8D-WmIc/0/di" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></a></p><p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8OVUCKlEpq84wOYBRmP8D-WmIc/1/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8OVUCKlEpq84wOYBRmP8D-WmIc/1/di" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></a></p><p></p><p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/mnt/healthnews/~4/Ng4JtHYxsAk" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/mnt/healthnews/~3/Ng4JtHYxsAk/3yq6" target="_blank">More...</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tD33NAt, post: 2106295, member: 124445"] The Kentucky Health and Welfare Committee has rejected a prescriptive bill (SB 38) that would have required abortion providers to perform an ultrasound and offer the woman a chance to view the image before the procedure, the Louisville Courier-Journal reports (Yetter, Louisville Courier-Journal, 2/26). According to the bill text, the physician or an ultrasound technician would have been required to describe the image in detail, including "the dimensions of the embryo or fetus and the presence of external members and internal organs, if present and viewable" (Bill text, 3/1)... [URL="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8OVUCKlEpq84wOYBRmP8D-WmIc/0/da"][IMG]http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8OVUCKlEpq84wOYBRmP8D-WmIc/0/di[/IMG][/URL] [URL="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8OVUCKlEpq84wOYBRmP8D-WmIc/1/da"][IMG]http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8OVUCKlEpq84wOYBRmP8D-WmIc/1/di[/IMG][/URL] [IMG]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/mnt/healthnews/~4/Ng4JtHYxsAk[/IMG] [url=http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/mnt/healthnews/~3/Ng4JtHYxsAk/3yq6]More...[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top