Jul 11, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Information & News
Announements
legal action
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Unregistered" data-source="post: 2671700"><p>The position seems to have changed very quickly from "freedom of speech" to a complete gag on mentioning the individual - what is this "order" you speak of? </p><p></p><p>I think the people who have been misled and left out of pocket by this individual who fear the same may now happen to other people should at least be told. Allegedly the company is insolvent and the individual is bankrupt yet seemingly has thousands of pounds to spend on lawyers!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Unregistered, post: 2671700"] The position seems to have changed very quickly from "freedom of speech" to a complete gag on mentioning the individual - what is this "order" you speak of? I think the people who have been misled and left out of pocket by this individual who fear the same may now happen to other people should at least be told. Allegedly the company is insolvent and the individual is bankrupt yet seemingly has thousands of pounds to spend on lawyers! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top