Jul 4, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
moon landing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="noneofurbusiness" data-source="post: 2946895" data-attributes="member: 125815"><p>So wait wait wait... lemme get this straight... I want to clarify what it is some of you are saying...Man went to the moon with a computer whose processing technology barely equaled your average desktop calculator and primitive rocket technology.. and yet we have these badass supercomputers and space shuttles nowadays, and yet you mean to tell me.. we... landed on the moon with still a bare comprehension of space, gravitational fields, solar radiation, rocket propulsion, ect., and yet we haven't done that with all of our modern technology?</p><p></p><p>the moon landing was done in a hollywood basement. Oh but he was moon bouncing! I can moon bounce too with cables attached to me and pulleys on the ceiling. </p><p></p><p>And if what Wax said is true.. c'mon dude.. its been 40 years.. you mean to tell me that they can't recode that data and show it back to its original color and detail?</p><p>I mean for chrissakes they re-did the entire Star Wars trilogy and made that great! So why can't they do the friggin 'moon landing?'</p><p></p><p></p><p>Go ahead.. tell me Neil Armstrong couldn't be faking that kind of pride from never accomplished that. I'd be the most prideful person if the government paid me a freighter full of cash and never taxed me again..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="noneofurbusiness, post: 2946895, member: 125815"] So wait wait wait... lemme get this straight... I want to clarify what it is some of you are saying...Man went to the moon with a computer whose processing technology barely equaled your average desktop calculator and primitive rocket technology.. and yet we have these badass supercomputers and space shuttles nowadays, and yet you mean to tell me.. we... landed on the moon with still a bare comprehension of space, gravitational fields, solar radiation, rocket propulsion, ect., and yet we haven't done that with all of our modern technology? the moon landing was done in a hollywood basement. Oh but he was moon bouncing! I can moon bounce too with cables attached to me and pulleys on the ceiling. And if what Wax said is true.. c'mon dude.. its been 40 years.. you mean to tell me that they can't recode that data and show it back to its original color and detail? I mean for chrissakes they re-did the entire Star Wars trilogy and made that great! So why can't they do the friggin 'moon landing?' Go ahead.. tell me Neil Armstrong couldn't be faking that kind of pride from never accomplished that. I'd be the most prideful person if the government paid me a freighter full of cash and never taxed me again.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top