Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ChinwenduO" data-source="post: 2947035" data-attributes="member: 98512">obviously. you link was rubbish as is the newer one.why would checking for credibility be foolish? or... some people actually have an understanding that exceeds that of highschool level conspiracy theorists.&nbsp; Then you&#039;re gonna have to work just a tad harder if you don&#039;t want to be considered and idiot or a troll or both.whoa.... wey hey.... un hunh.... you really knocked yourself out.... credible in the extreme. In fact that guy is such a genius that he can&#039;t figure out the &#039;crosshairs&#039; in a camera are on the ground glass (as in the Hassey that was used) but they don&#039;t appear on the film plane. Thus they wouldn&#039;t show up on the film because there is nothing to burn them onto the film plane during the exposure of a frame. They are silkscreened onto the ground glass. Total genius that guy is.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ChinwenduO, post: 2947035, member: 98512"] obviously. you link was rubbish as is the newer one. why would checking for credibility be foolish? or... some people actually have an understanding that exceeds that of highschool level conspiracy theorists. Then you're gonna have to work just a tad harder if you don't want to be considered and idiot or a troll or both. whoa.... wey hey.... un hunh.... you really knocked yourself out.... credible in the extreme. In fact that guy is such a genius that he can't figure out the 'crosshairs' in a camera are on the ground glass (as in the Hassey that was used) but they don't appear on the film plane. Thus they wouldn't show up on the film because there is nothing to burn them onto the film plane during the exposure of a frame. They are silkscreened onto the ground glass. Total genius that guy is. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…