Jun 16, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Information & News
RSS News
Science News
More WTF BS at the LHC?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Geek" data-source="post: 2114807" data-attributes="member: 246624"><p>A while ago, <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/09/the_truth_is_in_there.php" target="_blank">I complained that the people running the LHC did not have their act together </a>when it came to managing and disseminating information for the interested public. I took a little flack for that (see comments) but I was right. And I'm still right. We (the interested public) were just recently given a <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/03/our_objective_over_the_next_18.php" target="_blank">very nice overview of the potential for the next several months of research.</a> Then, today, we find out that the LHC is <a href="http://news.discovery.com/space/the-lhc-to-shut-down-again.html" target="_blank">fundamentally busted and will be shut down for a significant rebuild. </a> And part of that news is that this has been the plan for a long time. But I guess they forgot. Or something.</p><p></p><p>Can anyone explain to me what is going on? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/03/more_wtf_bs_at_the_lhc.php#commentsArea" target="_blank">Read the comments on this post...</a><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GregLadensBlog/~4/kv483KNod60" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GregLadensBlog/~3/kv483KNod60/more_wtf_bs_at_the_lhc.php" target="_blank">More...</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Geek, post: 2114807, member: 246624"] A while ago, [URL="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/09/the_truth_is_in_there.php"]I complained that the people running the LHC did not have their act together [/URL]when it came to managing and disseminating information for the interested public. I took a little flack for that (see comments) but I was right. And I'm still right. We (the interested public) were just recently given a [URL="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/03/our_objective_over_the_next_18.php"]very nice overview of the potential for the next several months of research.[/URL] Then, today, we find out that the LHC is [URL="http://news.discovery.com/space/the-lhc-to-shut-down-again.html"]fundamentally busted and will be shut down for a significant rebuild. [/URL] And part of that news is that this has been the plan for a long time. But I guess they forgot. Or something. Can anyone explain to me what is going on? [URL="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/03/more_wtf_bs_at_the_lhc.php#commentsArea"]Read the comments on this post...[/URL][IMG]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GregLadensBlog/~4/kv483KNod60[/IMG] [url=http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GregLadensBlog/~3/kv483KNod60/more_wtf_bs_at_the_lhc.php]More...[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top