Jul 9, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Poll: Belief in pseudoscience/paranormal phenomena
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="laetusatheos" data-source="post: 3056281" data-attributes="member: 162163"><p>Most of us are not qualified to do this research. We don't know how to evaluate statistical validity, investigators' credentials, don't know the funding source for articles we read on alt medicine, etc. Nor is there any reason we should have to take the time to do it. If I get liver cancer, I may do some reseearch, but I am not going to spend my time figuring out whether herbal cold remedies are credible.</p><p></p><p>This is why there is an FDA, and it's why there are tens of thousands of PhD chemists and biologists in universities spending $billions researching these issues. I am going to rely on an extensive set of qualified people to decide what is safe and effective, because they are more likely to get it right than I am. I don't have to do gas mileage tests or crash trials before I decide what kind of car to buy. </p><p></p><p></p><p>This is certainly true, but what it means to me is, "if Claritin or many chemo drugs made it through the testing process despite their limited effectiveness, imagine how useless the substances that don't make the grade are."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="laetusatheos, post: 3056281, member: 162163"] Most of us are not qualified to do this research. We don't know how to evaluate statistical validity, investigators' credentials, don't know the funding source for articles we read on alt medicine, etc. Nor is there any reason we should have to take the time to do it. If I get liver cancer, I may do some reseearch, but I am not going to spend my time figuring out whether herbal cold remedies are credible. This is why there is an FDA, and it's why there are tens of thousands of PhD chemists and biologists in universities spending $billions researching these issues. I am going to rely on an extensive set of qualified people to decide what is safe and effective, because they are more likely to get it right than I am. I don't have to do gas mileage tests or crash trials before I decide what kind of car to buy. This is certainly true, but what it means to me is, "if Claritin or many chemo drugs made it through the testing process despite their limited effectiveness, imagine how useless the substances that don't make the grade are." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top