Jul 9, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Poll: Belief in pseudoscience/paranormal phenomena
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Patsy" data-source="post: 3056357" data-attributes="member: 140011"><p>I don't disagree. However, if an alternative treatment is based on, and promoted on claim X, but appears to 'work' via Y (the placebo effect), then this doesn't validate the basis on which the treatment is promoted on. In fact, it doesn't event validate the medication itself since the medication given may even have been entirely irrelevant to the healing (which is exactly how homeopathy sometimes appears to work). I think it is dishonest to promote as anything otherwise.</p><p></p><p>The next question to ask is whether we should justify a treatment purely on the placebo effect alone. I don’t think we should. I think a treatment should have a demonstrable and confirmed effect in alleviating an illness/condition before it can be offered as a treatment for that condition. This is partly the reason why I am against alternative medicine, because such demonstration and confirmation is generally lacking.</p><p></p><p>On a side note, here's an article which discusses alternative medicine which I agree with: http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/altwary.html</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Patsy, post: 3056357, member: 140011"] I don't disagree. However, if an alternative treatment is based on, and promoted on claim X, but appears to 'work' via Y (the placebo effect), then this doesn't validate the basis on which the treatment is promoted on. In fact, it doesn't event validate the medication itself since the medication given may even have been entirely irrelevant to the healing (which is exactly how homeopathy sometimes appears to work). I think it is dishonest to promote as anything otherwise. The next question to ask is whether we should justify a treatment purely on the placebo effect alone. I don’t think we should. I think a treatment should have a demonstrable and confirmed effect in alleviating an illness/condition before it can be offered as a treatment for that condition. This is partly the reason why I am against alternative medicine, because such demonstration and confirmation is generally lacking. On a side note, here's an article which discusses alternative medicine which I agree with: http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/altwary.html [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top