Jun 20, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OnTopic Community
Predictions and Prophecies
Poll: Do you believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="justgoodfolk" data-source="post: 1445068" data-attributes="member: 215289"><p>No the science of NIST is accurate and non political that explains the events </p><p>http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm</p><p>while the alternatives offered by sites as aetruth and sholars for 911truth are clearly crank science of failed people outside their field of expertise.</p><p></p><p>AE911Truth.INFO is dedicated to exposing the lies and mistakes of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. They claim to be an advocacy group for engineers and architects questioning the "official story" of the 9/11 attacks, but it's really just putting up a front for PR purposes. They pretend to be spreading real and valuable information, but their website and presentations are filled with misinformation and lies.</p><p>http://www.ae911truth.info/tiki-index.php</p><p></p><p>Someone refers to loose change whose maker now says the movie definitely contains errors, still does contain some dubious claims and does come to some conclusions that are not backed up by the facts.</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUFTV6sjEdo</p><p>That's what the guy says who made this shameful piece of disinfo yet "truthers" still refer to it as a source of information exposing their lack of knowledge or any critical thiking capability.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="justgoodfolk, post: 1445068, member: 215289"] No the science of NIST is accurate and non political that explains the events http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm while the alternatives offered by sites as aetruth and sholars for 911truth are clearly crank science of failed people outside their field of expertise. AE911Truth.INFO is dedicated to exposing the lies and mistakes of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. They claim to be an advocacy group for engineers and architects questioning the "official story" of the 9/11 attacks, but it's really just putting up a front for PR purposes. They pretend to be spreading real and valuable information, but their website and presentations are filled with misinformation and lies. http://www.ae911truth.info/tiki-index.php Someone refers to loose change whose maker now says the movie definitely contains errors, still does contain some dubious claims and does come to some conclusions that are not backed up by the facts. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUFTV6sjEdo That's what the guy says who made this shameful piece of disinfo yet "truthers" still refer to it as a source of information exposing their lack of knowledge or any critical thiking capability. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top