Jun 16, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussions
Religion
Question for Christians: Is making an imaginary picture and calling it
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MJavedIqbal" data-source="post: 2190461" data-attributes="member: 759485"><p>Christ is not a lie & blasphemy? Christ is not an imaginary character whereas his pictures are mere imagination.</p><p>This is an evil effect of Romans on the Christianity. They believed in false gods</p><p>and therefore needed a tangible evidence of their presence, so they drew </p><p>imaginary paintings of them. On the contrary Christ son of Mary was a real</p><p>person and allowing Michel Angelo to decorate the church with imaginary</p><p>paintings of Christ was a blasphemy. Because no artist however good can</p><p>draw the inner light and glowing face of a noble prophet, nor can depict</p><p>beauty of his face.</p><p></p><p>Look at Muslims, they never allow their artists to paint Muhammad. They</p><p>have a decorum which Christianity has lost.</p><p>Do you think that Roman Catholic clergy has erred in this regard?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MJavedIqbal, post: 2190461, member: 759485"] Christ is not a lie & blasphemy? Christ is not an imaginary character whereas his pictures are mere imagination. This is an evil effect of Romans on the Christianity. They believed in false gods and therefore needed a tangible evidence of their presence, so they drew imaginary paintings of them. On the contrary Christ son of Mary was a real person and allowing Michel Angelo to decorate the church with imaginary paintings of Christ was a blasphemy. Because no artist however good can draw the inner light and glowing face of a noble prophet, nor can depict beauty of his face. Look at Muslims, they never allow their artists to paint Muhammad. They have a decorum which Christianity has lost. Do you think that Roman Catholic clergy has erred in this regard? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top