Jun 15, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Mobile
Carriers
Rogers
Roger Federer vs Pete Sampras. Who is best all time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mike" data-source="post: 2218446" data-attributes="member: 209371"><p>While you cant really decide since Roger is still playing. I think Roger will probably play a few more years and probably get one or maybe two more grand slam titles. Personnaly unless Roger wins probably 3 more titles I still think Pete was the best ever because Pete had great players to compete with during is time, such as Agassi ,Courier and Chang.. During the majority of Rogers dominance he had virtually no competition He hasnt been challenged until Nadal came along and Nadal has had his number.. You cant really count Andy Roddick. Andy is not even in the same league as aggassi or Courier . I think if you put Roger in Pete's shoes he wouldnt have had the success of Pete.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mike, post: 2218446, member: 209371"] While you cant really decide since Roger is still playing. I think Roger will probably play a few more years and probably get one or maybe two more grand slam titles. Personnaly unless Roger wins probably 3 more titles I still think Pete was the best ever because Pete had great players to compete with during is time, such as Agassi ,Courier and Chang.. During the majority of Rogers dominance he had virtually no competition He hasnt been challenged until Nadal came along and Nadal has had his number.. You cant really count Andy Roddick. Andy is not even in the same league as aggassi or Courier . I think if you put Roger in Pete's shoes he wouldnt have had the success of Pete. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top