Jun 16, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
iHav to Drive
Show Off
(see picture) Question about car starters - when are they completely worn?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Atom" data-source="post: 2057361" data-attributes="member: 514050"><p>(image) 1983 Suburban - Starter barely turning at ignition - Won't start truck?</p><p>[ http://berkey.biz/starter.jpg ]</p><p></p><p>Please view this picture to help answer my questions.</p><p>Thanks for any help you can give.</p><p></p><p>My Suburban's starter is not turning fast enough to start the truck. In fact it acts like the batteries are both drained. The batteries have both been charged, and I hooked up jumper cables to boost the power when trying to start, but it didn't change the symptoms.</p><p></p><p>My inspection of the cables showed no corrosion at the terminals. My inspection of the starter innards shows grooving in the brushes and copper (aren't they supposed to be smooth?), and from what I understand from past starters, there are supposed to be slots between the copper contacts (at least I think that's what I've seen before), but there isn't on this one. I've never before seen a worn out starter in terms of the copper contacts, so I am wondering if you think this starter looks perfectly functional or if it has run its lifespan. Take a look at the picture, and if you have any questions, leave an answer or email me at "adam @ berkey . biz" (no spaces)</p><p></p><p>Thanks...</p><p></p><p>I took it down to Schucks to get tested, but their test doesn't include the friction of the compression of an engine, so I'm wondering though it passed the test on their testing equipment, that the actual use of it trying to compress the cylinders in the truck need more "juice."</p><p></p><p>[ http://berkey.biz/starter.jpg ]</p><p>YOU WROTE: "why not just bite the bullet buy a new starter and be happy for ten years?"</p><p>==</p><p></p><p>Before I buy a starter for $180 that I didn't need in the end, I want to make sure the problem really IS the starter.</p><p></p><p>Here's what I'm looking for in the way of answers:</p><p></p><p>"There isn't supposed to be gaps between the copper contacts. And the grooves in the brushes and copper contacts are perfectly normal. Your starter looks fine. The problem must be somewhere else..."</p><p></p><p>or</p><p></p><p>"Yes, there are supposed to be gaps between the copper contacts. The pic shows the copper has wore all the way down, so it is definitely time to replace your starter."</p><p></p><p>or</p><p></p><p>"No you still have a good way to go before your starter goes bad. The problem must be somewhere else."</p><p></p><p>--</p><p></p><p>So far you guys think it still looks good, right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Atom, post: 2057361, member: 514050"] (image) 1983 Suburban - Starter barely turning at ignition - Won't start truck? [ http://berkey.biz/starter.jpg ] Please view this picture to help answer my questions. Thanks for any help you can give. My Suburban's starter is not turning fast enough to start the truck. In fact it acts like the batteries are both drained. The batteries have both been charged, and I hooked up jumper cables to boost the power when trying to start, but it didn't change the symptoms. My inspection of the cables showed no corrosion at the terminals. My inspection of the starter innards shows grooving in the brushes and copper (aren't they supposed to be smooth?), and from what I understand from past starters, there are supposed to be slots between the copper contacts (at least I think that's what I've seen before), but there isn't on this one. I've never before seen a worn out starter in terms of the copper contacts, so I am wondering if you think this starter looks perfectly functional or if it has run its lifespan. Take a look at the picture, and if you have any questions, leave an answer or email me at "adam @ berkey . biz" (no spaces) Thanks... I took it down to Schucks to get tested, but their test doesn't include the friction of the compression of an engine, so I'm wondering though it passed the test on their testing equipment, that the actual use of it trying to compress the cylinders in the truck need more "juice." [ http://berkey.biz/starter.jpg ] YOU WROTE: "why not just bite the bullet buy a new starter and be happy for ten years?" == Before I buy a starter for $180 that I didn't need in the end, I want to make sure the problem really IS the starter. Here's what I'm looking for in the way of answers: "There isn't supposed to be gaps between the copper contacts. And the grooves in the brushes and copper contacts are perfectly normal. Your starter looks fine. The problem must be somewhere else..." or "Yes, there are supposed to be gaps between the copper contacts. The pic shows the copper has wore all the way down, so it is definitely time to replace your starter." or "No you still have a good way to go before your starter goes bad. The problem must be somewhere else." -- So far you guys think it still looks good, right? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top